While our physical offices are closed until further notice in accordance with Austin's COVID-19 "stay home-work safe" order, the Handbook of Texas will remain available at no-cost for you, your fellow history enthusiasts, and all Texas students currently mandated to study from home. If you have the capacity to help us maintain our online Texas history resources during these uncertain times, please consider making a 100% tax-deductible contribution today. Thank you for your support of TSHA and Texas history. Donate Today »


Oscar Mauzy

GILMER-AIKIN LAWS. In 1947 the Fiftieth Texas Legislature established a committee to study educational reform, in the wake of a legislative deadlock over the passage of a minimum-salary law for Texas public school teachers. This committee was later named the Gilmer-Aikin Committee, after Representative Claud Gilmer and Senator A. M. Aikin, Jr. The committee's work culminated in proposals to make Texas public schools more efficient and better funded in order to provide better educational opportunities for Texas children. The Gilmer-Aikin Committee used a statewide network of advisory and county committees to inform the public of its goals. This broad dissemination of information about the proposals was an indispensable element in the eventual passage of the Gilmer-Aikin Laws.

In 1949 the Senate of the Fifty-first Legislature readily adopted the three bills containing the Gilmer-Aikin Committee proposals. Senator James E. Taylor, a conservative member of the committee, guided the proposals through the Senate. Passage in the House was more problematic. Representative Rae Files Still, a former Gilmer-Aikin Committee member and sponsor of the House companion bills, avoided temporarily relinquishing her position as chairman of the House Education Committee, by hearing the Senate bills rather than the House versions. Thus she sidestepped House rules, which would have required her to step down from the chair to present her bills. This careful maneuvering was required in order to overcome the stiff opposition of letter campaigns and critical radio shows that objected to two measures of the bill-replacement of an elected state superintendent of public instruction by an appointed commissioner of education, and the prohibition of the use of school buses by parochial schools. Opponents called the bills both Communist and Fascist and tried to kill them by delay tactics, including an attempt to break the quorum by encouraging a third of the House members to boycott the session. The House Education Committee hearings on the bills included the first all-night committee hearing in the Texas legislature's history. Finally, the bills were passed with some amendments, which were either accepted by the Senate or ironed out in the House-Senate conference committee.

The effects of the statute were evident immediately, as 4,500 school districts were consolidated into 2,900 more efficient administrative units. State equalization funding supplemented local taxes. Further, higher salaries attracted teachers to the classroom and encouraged the study of education among prospective teachers. School staffs were augmented by education specialists. State funding became dependent on attendance, thus providing an incentive to increase attendance.

The statute changed the nine-member appointed State Board of Education and the elected state superintendent of public instruction into an elected twenty-one-member board with the power to appoint a commissioner of education, subject to confirmation by the Texas Senate. The board and commissioner, supported by a staff, composed the State Department of Education, now the Texas Education Agency. The statute also guaranteed Texas children minimum public-schooling opportunities for twelve school years of nine months with a minimum of 175 actual teaching days per year. Later debates over the direction of educational reform in Texas have all been conducted within the framework provided by the Gilmer-Aikin Laws.

Rae Files Still, The Gilmer-Aikin Bills (Austin: Steck, 1950).

Image Use Disclaimer

All copyrighted materials included within the Handbook of Texas Online are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 related to Copyright and “Fair Use” for Non-Profit educational institutions, which permits the Texas State Historical Association (TSHA), to utilize copyrighted materials to further scholarship, education, and inform the public. The TSHA makes every effort to conform to the principles of fair use and to comply with copyright law.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The following, adapted from the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, is the preferred citation for this article.

Handbook of Texas Online, Oscar Mauzy, "GILMER-AIKIN LAWS," accessed June 06, 2020, http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/mlg01.

Uploaded on June 15, 2010. Published by the Texas State Historical Association.
visit the mytsha forums to participate

View these posts and more when you register your free MyTSHA account.

Call for Papers: Texas Center for Working-Class Studies Events, Symposia, and Workshops
Hi all! You may be interested in this call for papers I received from the Texas Center for Working-Class Studies at Collin College...

Katy Jennings' Ride Scholarly Research Request
I'm doing research on Catherine Jennings Lockwood, specifically the incident known as "Katy Jennings' Ride." Her father was Gordon C. Jennings, the oldest man to die at the Alamo...

Texas Constitution of 1836 Co-Author- Elisha Pease? Ask a Historian
The TSHA profile of Elisha Marshall Pease states that he wrote part of the Texas Constitution although he was only a 24 year-old assistant secretary (not elected). I cannot find any other mention of this authorship work by Pease in other credible research about the credited Constution authors...