While our physical offices are closed until further notice in accordance with Austin's COVID-19 "stay home-work safe" order, the Handbook of Texas will remain available at no-cost for you, your fellow history enthusiasts, and all Texas students currently mandated to study from home. If you have the capacity to help us maintain our online Texas history resources during these uncertain times, please consider making a 100% tax-deductible contribution today. Thank you for your support of TSHA and Texas history. Donate Today »


PINK BOLLWORM. The pink bollworm (Heliothis armigera) affects cotton production in many South Texas counties, particularly those counties along the Rio Grande. The pink bollworm is the larval stage of a small brown moth. The insect passes through four stages of development-egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The larva of the worm is the destroyer, as it eats the maturing seed within the cotton boll. The life cycle in midsummer is usually completed in twenty-five to thirty days, and as many as six generations of the insect may occur in a season. The pest entered from Mexico and became a menace in 1916. In 1917 the state legislature passed the Pink Bollworm Act, which subsequently was modified to provide regulations to control the worm and restrict the infected area. Three years later the Thirty-sixth Legislature established the Pink Bollworm Commission to oversee the enforcement of state regulations. In addition, a Compensation Claims Board was established to deal with the financial losses of those farmers forced to destroy infected crops. One of the worst years for bollworm infestation was 1938, when they were reported in more than 119 counties. By 1944 the claims board was paying claimants an average of $500. To control the pink bollworm in the state, first the commission and then the Texas Department of Agriculture laid down rules and regulations governing planting, cultivating, growing, and harvesting cotton. To prevent over-wintering (winter survival) of the pest, shredding and plowing under of the cotton stalks by given dates is required. Federal quarantine regulates interstate movement of cotton from infested to noninfested areas. While regulating the growing season proved somewhat effective, it did not eradicate the pest. As late as 1952, cotton losses from this insect exceeded $28 million in thirty-eight South Texas counties.

During the 1960s and 1970s chemical insecticides, including DDT, were used in attempts to control the insect. With the heightened interest in nonchemical pest control in the 1980s, scientists with the Texas Department of Agriculture experimented with hormone manipulation of the bollworm and the tobacco budworm. Through the use of insect pheromones, researchers tricked male bollworms into mating with female budworms. Because the genitalia were mismatched, the insects became locked together and died. Since 1955, the overall goal of farmers and scientists has been to try to control rather than eradicate the pest. Volunteer efforts by farmers that have been successful have included delayed planting, deep plowing, and winter irrigations. Some control measures were so effective, in fact, that in 1978 the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission recommended to the governor that the commission be abolished. In 1995 the state legislature passed the Pest Management Law, which merged the bollworm program with the state's program to destroy the cotton boll weevil. At that time the primary means of control continued to be the destruction of cotton stalks, which thus interrupted the life cycle of the insect. In 1995 problem areas in the state included the Trans-Pecos valley and the El Paso valley. See also AGRICULTURE, and COTTON CULTURE.


Austin American-Statesman, August 20, 1982. Truman McMahan, "The Fight against the Pink Bollworm in Texas," Southwestern Historical Quarterly 94 (July 1990). Ernest Scholl, Report of the Pink Bollworm of Cotton (Austin: Texas Department of Agriculture, 1919). Texas Sunset Advisory Commission, Pink Bollworm Commission: Staff Report to the Sunset Advisory Commission (Austin, 1978).

Image Use Disclaimer

All copyrighted materials included within the Handbook of Texas Online are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 related to Copyright and “Fair Use” for Non-Profit educational institutions, which permits the Texas State Historical Association (TSHA), to utilize copyrighted materials to further scholarship, education, and inform the public. The TSHA makes every effort to conform to the principles of fair use and to comply with copyright law.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The following, adapted from the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, is the preferred citation for this article.

Handbook of Texas Online, "PINK BOLLWORM," accessed July 05, 2020, http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/ajp01.

Uploaded on June 15, 2010. Modified on September 4, 2013. Published by the Texas State Historical Association.
visit the mytsha forums to participate

View these posts and more when you register your free MyTSHA account.

Call for Papers: Texas Center for Working-Class Studies Events, Symposia, and Workshops
Hi all! You may be interested in this call for papers I received from the Texas Center for Working-Class Studies at Collin College...

Katy Jennings' Ride Scholarly Research Request
I'm doing research on Catherine Jennings Lockwood, specifically the incident known as "Katy Jennings' Ride." Her father was Gordon C. Jennings, the oldest man to die at the Alamo...

Texas Constitution of 1836 Co-Author- Elisha Pease? Ask a Historian
The TSHA profile of Elisha Marshall Pease states that he wrote part of the Texas Constitution although he was only a 24 year-old assistant secretary (not elected). I cannot find any other mention of this authorship work by Pease in other credible research about the credited Constution authors...